Institutional structures of economic
promotion
Economic promotion activities can be organized in different
institutional forms.
In many industrialized countries, as well as in some advanced
developing countries, regional and local economic promotion is organized
as a separate public service entity. This may be a department of
local government or an organizationally separate entity.
Another option is to organize economic promotion as a public-private
partnership, where it depends on the specific circumstances which side has
the majority stake.
Yet another option is an active role of Chambers and Associations
or utilities in local economic promotion. In particular in the U.S.
it is quite common to find that utilities play this role, which is
motivated by the interest to attract new large-scale customers for their
services.
The following table summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of each
type. It should become obvious that there is no clear first-best option.
Type |
Advantage |
Disadvantage |
Public |
- Direct contact to public administration
- Potential strategic role, beyond short-term thinking
|
- Distance to private sector
- Risk of bureaucratic culture
- Risk of political peddling
|
Public-private |
- Flexibility
- Potentially business-like organizational culture
|
- Lack of democratic accountability
- Different, potentially conflictive expectations of public and
private stakeholders
- Distant from economically relevant departments of public
administration
|
Chambers and Associations |
- Very close to the private sector
- Business-orientation
|
- Distance to the public sector
- Conflict between lobbying and promotion
|
Utilities |
- Business-orientation
- Clear performance indicators
|
- Distance to the public sector
|
back
to: business-friendly orientation of government
top