BDS Services: The Nicaragua Approach of Group Consultation Methodology
       The point of departure for this approach is the
       "Joinville Model" in which 'nucleos' (nuclei) of trades were
       introduced as a service of the chamber of industry and trade in Santa
       Catarina, Brazil. These nucleos (groups of trades, most of them
       SMEs) are based on the principles of moderated group discussions with the
       purpose of identifying joint issues and problems as well as the exchange
       of experiences (learning by interacting). These processes also
       resulted in a more structured demand for commercial business development
       services. However, the most important result was the development and
       professionalisation of the organisation as a respected counterpart for
       government agencies. The chambers expanded their membership considerably
       (in particular SMEs) and democratized their structures.
       In Nicaragua, the structures of the chamber were too
       weak to implement this model. NGOs and service providers had relatively
       better structures and more contact with the target group of SMEs.
       Therefore, the Joinville experience was introduced as an approach to
       develop innovative BDS.
       
        - 
          Trades specific group consultation was also the
          point of departure. Moderated meetings of different enterprises (about
          10) were the backbone of this service. The aim was to strengthen
          entrepreneurial motivation, problem analysis, coaching during the
          identification of solutions and decisions, and motivating
          communication and interaction. 
- 
          The group meetings took place once per month in the
          immediate vicinity of the enterprises and did not last longer than 3
          hours. The first two meetings had clear structures, after that the
          concept was adapted more flexibly to the needs of the group (but there
          was always a prepared "script"). 
- 
          The consultation was complemented by the
          entrepreneurs' mutual visits (problem identification and monitoring
          during implementation of the improvements) and occasionally individual
          advice from the consultants. 
- 
          Specific trainings were arranged and conducted in
          the group (such as technical or management trainings). 
- 
          Trainings were conducted by a local consulting firm
          specialised on CEFE, participatory planning, and business consulting.
          The enterprises (furniture sector) were in one region
          ("cluster") and had different sizes, from micro to
          medium-sized enterprises. Competition varied, resulting in rivalry and
          tensions but also in networking for joint delivery (economies of
          scale). 
- 
          During the first phase of eight months, the
          enterprises paid 20% of the costs for the consulting firm according to
          a ratio obliging them to pay the last quota in case they were
          satisfied with the service. The firm received a bonus for new entrants
          to the group (incentive-oriented subvention). 
Methodology
       During the first session the issue of goal setting
       would be raised: what is an entrepreneurial objective? (challenging,
       measurable, tangible etc.; CEFE
       exercise MAREAR). Then, entrepreneurs would define their objectives for
       the current year considering few objectives but those that had a chance
       to be realised (strategy of direct implementation and achievement through
       one's own initiative). Objectives were supposed be noted on a flip chart
       and hung up visibly in the workshop.
       The next step were the mutual visits of the
       entrepreneurs. The purpose was to verify the realisation of
       entrepreneurial objectives and further exploration of weaknesses and
       potentials of the enterprises (methodology: walking through the
       business premises, noting and exchanging observations).
       Step by step, activities would become more specific,
       starting with cleaning up, the rearrangement of machines, rationalisation
       of operations, then energy efficiency and better use of raw materials for
       cost reduction, market analysis, production techniques, cost calculation,
       staff management, on-job-training, etc.
       The next sequence of the process was networking to
       manage joint delivery or subcontracting. In addition, enterprises would
       begin to shape their environment (negotiations with the municipality to
       buy a plot of land, using assistance opportunities such as workers'
       professional training in the public vocational training institution,
       access to credit and exchange of experiences with financial institutions,
       technology, export, etc.).
       Cost-benefit analysis of the pilot projects was
       positive. Further rationalisations will be possible in the case of higher
       degree of maturity of the product. Roughly calculated, the consulting
       contract cost US$ 10,000 - i.e. US$ 1000 per enterprise for approximately
       one year. In most cases, increases in turnover surpassed these costs
       easily. Enterprises which could not follow these dynamics (subsistence
       enterprises) would usually fail to show up after the first or the second
       meeting already, not for cost reasons but due to lack of motivation
       (principle of self selection).
       Another effect was an increasingly critical assessment
       of existing assistance opportunities and a public discussion about this
       (on the occasion of round table talks, "encuentros" with
       ministers, NGOs, donors etc.).
       The effect was also positive with regard to
       entrepreneurial self-confidence and initiative. Better market integration
       effectively took place.
       Formal organisations were not founded. This is a
       "red rag" in Nicaragua but is often required by the government
       (political control). Practising business oriented cooperation
       relationships was one of the biggest successes of this project.
       Lessons learnt/Constraints
       
        - 
          Availability of well trained consultants with
          enterprise experience and experience in participatory, interactive
          methods 
- 
          The methodology may be part of organisational
          development of associations or a stand-alone Business
          Development Service 
- 
          The product needs to be marketed, initial commercial
          structures in the market for business development services are
          required 
- 
          In case of success there is a danger of
          "appropriation" through government institutions or donors
          with the risk of exaggerated support or of undermining the principle
          of partial payment 
- 
          In principle, sustainability is possible, through
          partial subvention the approach functions probably much better with
          regard to quality and outreach. Supervision of the consultants is also
          expedient (quality, methods, innovation promotion, monitoring and
          evaluation) 
- 
          Promotion of clusters is not an instrument for
          subsistence economy. Qualification methodologies for the informal
          sector would be more appropriate in that case. Competition-oriented
          business consulting by means of interaction and networking requires
          entrepreneurial motivation, a certain degree of differentiation
          between enterprises and a potential for specialisation. 

 back
       to: business development service
back
       to: business development service
        
top 