Regional Networks for Start-up Promotion
        
The term "regional network" may
        be looked upon from two angles. The first relates to the term
        "regional". Under the perspective of local economic
        development, regional means going beyond local boundaries and trying to
        get several locational actors to get together. These may include, for
        instance, a group of neighbouring municipalities and institutions of
        provincial and federal level as well as private actors such as banks and
        savings institutions, universities and research institutes, employers'
        associations and other interest groups. The points of departure for such
        a grouping together on a regional level are manifold:
        
          - 
            
Sometimes central government funding
            is the reason. Several local areas join hands in order to create a,
            say, critical mass, that is able to absorb the funding. Otherwise,
            they would simply stay too small and not become eligible.
            
          
 
          - 
            
In other cases, regions are
            historically shaped (e.g. coal mining and steel areas) and comprise
            several municipalities. This results in economic features and
            problems cutting across administrative boundaries. Thus, as the
            economic issues are similar, there is no sense in staying alone.
            
          
 
          - 
            
Another motive is to pool resources
            from different sectors of the economy, such as banks, universities,
            associations and so forth in order to become more effective. Often,
            some of these sectors are not organised exactly along the
            administrative boundaries. Hence, if you want to get them on board,
            you need to become regional.
 
        
        Networks try to organise actors outside
        well established institutional forms. Compared with other types of
        organization, networks are "light" systems of organisation.
        Normally, they are not formally or legally institutionalised. Access and
        exit are easy. They are based on a high degree of informality and
        voluntarism. In short, their advantages may be enormous in terms of the
        pooling of resources and information sharing, and their costs are low.
        
For the reasons mentioned above, regional
        networks for start-up promotion have become a prominent feature of
        developing as well as developed countries. The activities realised by
        these networks include
        
          - 
            
the organisation of entrepreneurial
            get-togethers, seminars and workshops covering all aspects of
            business start-ups, financing and management,
 
          - 
            
the coordination of the activities of
            promotion agencies in order to avoid duplication of effort and waste
            of scarce resources,
 
          - 
            
the exchange of experience among
            network members and the collection of best practises as well as
 
          - 
            
the development of integrated
            approaches to business and job promotion and their joint
            implementation.
        
top 
          
 
        
        Two cases, one from Zambia, the other
        from Germany, may exemplify their functioning.
        
1. In Zambia, GTZ's "STEP IN"-
        programme (meaning "Integrated Skills Training for Employment
        Promotion") became part of a network comprising a total of 16
        projects and programmes of bilateral and multilateral donors and NGOs.
        The creation of this network was based on the experience that
        interventions in the field of start-up and employment promotion needed
        to be coordinated it they were to provide gainful jobs. Before, some
        actors had focused exclusively on microfinance, others were organising
        fairs and some were conducting training courses, but sustainable jobs
        were only to be created if the target group had access to a combination
        of all these services. The network really managed to improve the
        effectiveness and efficiency of start-up promotion in the informal
        sector in Zambia, and the "STEP-IN" programme drew a series of
        valuable lessons as to the factors permitting or hindering the evolution
        of the network (quoted from Ebba Augustin: Case Study Zambia -
        Networking for Employment Promotion, p. 142; in: Wolfgang Zehender (Hrsg.)
        Networking with Partners, Eschborn 2000):
        
          - 
            
Networks have to be task- and
            objective-oriented. Networking has to be a means, not an activity in
            itself, otherwise time and energy is wasted. […..]
            
          
 
          - 
            
Networking is a participatory
            learning process, where [….] a joint attempt is made to find an
            answer. Members should therefore learn to pose questions and should
            not feel under pressure to provide any answers.
            
          
 
          - 
            
Members of the network jointly have
            to agree on its structure, means of communication and objectives.
            
          
 
          - 
            
Networks can create a conflict of
            interest if they are not complementary to the daily work of its
            members. Demands of the network can overburden members, leading to a
            decline in services to the beneficiaries. [….]
 
        
        Another aspect that needs to be tackled
        in a cautious way is that of an assistance structure such as a
        secretariat to the network. In the case of Zambia, the
        "STEP-IN"- programme provided such a service. On the one hand,
        such a secretariat really acts as a facilitator to the network but on
        the other hand it may undermine its long-term sustainability, if (a) the
        cost of the secretariat are not shouldered by all or the majority of the
        network members and (b) if the activities are not incorporated into an
        appropriate institution, preferably represented by or with the
        involvement of the democratically elected local government.
Inspired
        by a perceived lack of entrepreneurial spirit in Germany and by high
        unemployment due to a structural crisis of the "old
        industries", the German federal country North Rhine-Westphalia
        initiated the "GO! Initiative" in 1995. GO! is a joint
        programme of the provincial government of North Rhine-Westphalia,
        chambers and employers associations, trade unions, municipal incubators
        and technology centres, universities at the local and regional levels as
        well as municipalities. Under the GO! roof, around 30 local and regional
        networks emerged. The specific structure in terms of membership and
        concrete tasks of each of the individual network members depends on the
        local circumstances. Whereas some of the network members provide
        services related to its specific area of competence, others act as
        network coordinators. The initiative has become one of the most well
        known start-up programmes in Germany and contributed to the shaping of a
        new image of Germany's industrial heartland. You will find more
        information here.
        
        
        
next chapter:
        promoting and supporting spin-offs
        
last chapter:
        small business estates
back to:
       entrepreneurship promotion
        
top